Thomas Jefferson in bronze at Monticello and in clay at StudioEIS
Creating consensus, with respect to what these portraits might look like, is easy the further back in time we go. In a pre-photography world, assuming availability of historical & visual reference material, the task is easier: We wouldn’t expect George Washington to be smiling broadly or Thomas Jefferson to be grimacing – and so we look at a fairly narrow range of good painters and sculptors- (occasionally punctuated by the great - Houdon, is in a class by himself) analyze their work for repetitive stylization attitudes and flourishes, and then begin the task of adding to the body of historical portraiture.
Our response to these 18th century gentlemen (almost no women- and by that I mean women who held political office or whose patents affected the expansion of the American economy as it comes to dominate the world by the mid 19th century), is based entirely upon this cache of existing reference material - frozen in time. We have historical literature, paintings, sculpture, period fiction and anecdotal descriptions at our disposal to help put a face on these lives of the famous, politically accomplished and the industrious-who StudioEIS often recreates as bronze sculptures.
We (StudioEIS) may now begin to take some small bit of license with the advent of photography in 1839. America’s first look into the camera, 1839-1864, a part of the Daguerreotype collection in the Library of Congress is hugely rewarding - we no longer need to speculate about hair style, clothing, or period attitudes- that information so necessary for our work is all there in photographs for the first time - and it is as liberating as it is informative. These same early photos also inform the viewer what is often missing from our frame of reference, and that is natural attitude.
Photography makes it possible to see what people really looked like even if they preened for the camera. Take a look at the wonderful book “Young America” Daguerreotypes by Southworth and Hawes - it is absolutely riveting. Not only do we see the famous, but we see the ordinary, often organized by professional association, which distinguishes one from another on the basis of dress, in turn revealing vast differences in class - it is a fascinating document and so useful to the visual storytellers like those of us at StudioEIS.
Reverend Rollin Heber Neale, William Wadsworth Longellow, Alvin Adams & Charles Sumner
Even if we don’t know how tall or thin someone was, we can use the photographic image to make comparative decisions about their height & weight, and general demeanor - much as we did when we made a portrait figure of Nikita Khrushchev, whose diminutive height was closely guarded by the Russians when we were commissioned to make his portrait. We also noticed that Abraham Lincoln was, on more than one occasion falling asleep in front of the camera; well documented by his drooping eye lids.
Nikita Khrushchev, Abraham Lincoln and Richard Nixon -a few of the Presidents sculpted by StudioEIS.
There is only a tiny revelation after all is said and done; this area of historical sculpture making, however well-trodden, begs for naturalism. This may sound overly simplistic, but consider the famous and politically powerful bring lots of popular memory to the artist’s studio – it is our job to discover what someone “really” looked like. This is why Madame Tussauds has been such a giant hit since the French Revolution. People can get next to the famous, the powerful, the accomplished, and indeed even the notorious or the dead, and feel as if they are standing next to the real person. In the case of Tussaud - today it’s mostly about fame for the viewer, but for us it’s got to do with history, art and storytelling. This is why WE MAKE PRESIDENTS.
Abraham Lincoln in bronze at President Lincoln's Cottage and for the National Miliitary Cemetery and Visitor Center at Gettysburg.